The email scandal grows.
The FBI was apparently investigating Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin and the FBI found a laptop belonging to one of these people with Clinton emails. Apparently about 10,000 of them.
“You don’t do this, a former senior Justice Department official, who was not named, told The New Yorker, which reported the development overnight. “It’s aberrational. It violates decades of practice.” If this is unprecedented and you don’t do this then why is this loser not being named? This person gives a quote but won’t be named? Why? It violates decades of practice? WTF. So we allow crooks and liars and God knows what to be elected because of practice? This is why our Congress has such a low approval rating. Once they get in through “practice” then they have a 90% reelection rate and then the fox is in charge of the hen house.
Now everyone is up in arms over this. This is not done. This is unprecedented. NOW the Attorney General Loretta Lynch isn’t OK with the FBIs decision this time. This time it goes against Hillary and they can’t fix it or whitewash it in time.
And Lynch said she did not want James Comey the Director of the FBI to break the department’s practice (here is that word practice again) of refusing comment on ongoing investigations, another administration official told the publication, or to take action that could influence the November election, but Comey reported he felt compelled to report the discovery specifically because of the impending election.
Breaking the practice, the Justice Department official said, “impugns the integrity and reputation of the candidate, even though there’s no finding by a court, or in this instance even an indictment.” And what is wrong with that if the candidate has NO integrity why would we want to elect her president?
The Justice Department has long advised prosecutors and law enforcement officials to avoid appearances that it was interfering in elections, including holding off on filing charges on present cases.
This is absurd to me. If the candidate is a liar, thief or even a murderer why the hell should they be given a chance to become president. If she broke the law why let it go till after the election? What then?
The FBI is not interfering because people still get to vote. The morons, trolls and pathetic losers will still vote for her even if they proved she murdered someone.
It was OK for Attorney General Loretta Lynch to meet with Bill Clinton on the tarmac of an airport and whitewash the first investigation. AG Lynch said she would abide by the FBI decision when she probably knew it was a whitewash. Now she doesn’t like what the FBI has to say.
That was not interfering with an election but trotting out these women with unfounded accusations against Trump was OK? The AG and others want to keep this quiet until after the election just like Rahm Emanuel did in Chicago with the police shooting. They covered it up and delayed the investigation over a year until after his most recent election in 2015. This is what they wanted to do with Hillary because they know once in the office of the presidency it will be hard to bring her to justice.
Hillary said on a late night show her emails were boring. So, if this classified emails are boring then what has she got to worry about? If she did nothing wrong, and the FBI did say she did, then what has she got to worry about?
Hillary is so crooked, has lied so many time, it is just a way of life for the Clintons. She lied about Benghazi and then lied again when she said the people there lied about what happened. She lied about being broke when Bill left office. She lied when she said she took fire while overseas. And there is so much more.
It was ok for Hillary to ignore a subpoena and not turn over her server until it was wiped clean.
Not only that Obama covered this email scandal up for six years. He should be tried and go to jail. What happened to the rule of law? I guess it doesn’t apply to our community organizer Obama.
Obama and the rest of the Democrats wanted to investigate and bring to trial Bush for waterboarding UNTIL they found out Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats knew about it.
They sure as hell didn’t bring Hillary to justice for Benghazi. There wasn’t even an investigation, a real investigation. She does two things with her mouth, she LIES AND PANDERS.
I am not crazy about Donald Trump but he hasn’t gotten anyone killed, yet. He doesn’t call people deplorable while smiling at your face. She could care less about the people, the voters or anyone else.
She is a follower of Saul Alinsky who was her mentor and whose book Rules for Radicals has a forward praising Satan as the first radical. She and Bill Clinton are sick people, he commits adultery on several occasions and she stayed with him. She apparently has no self respect or self worth and now wants to run the country? This when she can’t even secure emails with classified information.
But she has been fighting for women her whole life so they can reach their full potential. WTF does that mean and how does she know someone’s full potential and what it is? How was she fighting and who was she fighting and what was she fighting for other than their FULL POTENTIAL. What was her success rate? How many did she help reach their full potential? And when they reached their full potential how did she know and was she sure that was it?
Update: And so after all the news and uproar FBI director Comey AGAIN recommends no action be taken against Hillary Clinton. Which begs to ask the question, who got to him? They couldn’t meet on the tarmac like Bill Clinton did with the Attorney General. So Comey violated decades of “practice” so we let a liar, thief and crook possibly get elected president? Yes the foxes are truly in charge of the hen house. IT IS TIME TO TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY BY WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY.
“The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. … What country before ever existed a century and half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.”
― Thomas Jefferson,
Comes to you from ihatebullshit.com.